Discretion in the Recruitment of Household Staff
On why the most consequential household appointments are made through silence rather than search engines, and the principles that govern a discreet recruitment.
When a distinguished household needs a senior addition to its staff, a butler, a Chief of Staff, an estate manager, the recruitment is rarely advertised. There are good reasons for that restraint. A public search announces a vulnerability the household would prefer to keep to itself. It attracts candidates whose chief qualification is a willingness to be visible. And it puts the principal in the awkward position of declining many in order to choose one.
Over many years we have refined a different approach, which we think of simply as discreet recruitment. It is slower, more demanding of time, and far more reliable in outcome. A few principles govern it.
Before any candidate is approached, we spend time understanding the household itself. We ask, carefully, what kind of person the principal would genuinely wish to live alongside, not merely what skills are required on paper. We meet the existing staff, watch how the household functions, and form an honest view of what the position truly demands. Only then do we begin to think about candidates.
This is the step most often skipped, and its absence causes more failed appointments than any other single factor. A residence that runs to formal protocol will not be well served by an exceptionally talented person whose temperament is informal, however impressive their references. A household with young children needs a different sensitivity from one without. A principal who travels constantly requires a different steadiness from one who is largely at home. These are not preferences to be guessed at; they are facts to be established.
The candidates we recommend are, with rare exception, people known to us personally, often for ten or fifteen years. We have watched them in service, seen them mature in responsibility, and corresponded with them about the positions they have held. When a vacancy arises, we approach them privately, on the understanding that the conversation may go no further. Most do not.
This is the real asset of a Private Advisory Office: not a database, but a memory. The candidate of the right calibre for a particular household is rarely the one currently looking for a position. They are content where they are, and the move must be worth the disturbance of a settled life. To persuade such a person requires a relationship that long predates the vacancy.
The candidates worth knowing are not on the market. They are in the world, and they must be remembered.
We do not ask for references in the conventional sense. Written references, even from distinguished principals, can be diplomatically vague. Instead, in confidence and with the candidate's prior knowledge, we speak with people who have actually observed them in service. We ask specific questions, and we listen carefully for what is not said. A skilled referee communicates as much through hesitation as through endorsement, and over many such conversations one develops an ear for the difference.
It is also why, as a matter of principle, we will not approach a candidate currently in the employment of a principal we know without first speaking to that principal directly. The trust of those we serve is not transferable, and a recruitment that costs us a relationship is, in the long view, a recruitment we have lost.
Once the right candidate has been identified, the introduction to the principal is itself handled with care. We do not present a slate of curricula vitae to be compared. Wherever possible we present one person at a time, in the proper setting, with enough time for a real conversation. The principal's own judgement is, in the end, the only judgement that matters; our role is simply to make sure it is exercised on the right person.
Conducted in this way, a senior recruitment may take six months or longer. In our experience it then lasts fifteen years or more. The arithmetic, set out plainly, favours patience.
MobilityResidency and Mobility for the International Family
Residency planning is no longer a tax matter alone. We examine why mobility decisions for the modern international family must consider household, schooling, succession, and quiet continuity.
Read essay